Score: 10

"Truely spectacular!"

submission: Colour My Fate

date: January 1, 2010

This game was definitely worth playing and is a great idea just like the others. It was also way better than the others. I have all the items including the star, but I don't have any idea what the "tree" is. Other than that it's "absolutely magnificent".

Score: 7

"pretty nice"

submission: Bloons Tower Defense 4

date: December 26, 2009

ok game i guess. it gets repetitive and isnt worth playing after a while. plus if i right click, the game freezes up. not the best game.

Score: 6

"pretty good"

submission: Neo v Smith

date: December 21, 2009

besides the green people, weird fighting motions/stances, and Neo just storming off at the end, this was a pretty good movie thing.

Score: 7

"Great work, but..."

submission: Warfare: 1917

date: December 21, 2009

It is obvious that a lot of work was put into this game. It was a game really worth playing, but not nearly as good as Warfare 1944. The ability to make your troops preform certain.....actions, such as falling back to different areas, should have been introduced in this one.

I also was quite displeased when "certain" actions were preformed. One of which is when my troops can't seem to line up a shot on a human body. A five year old could! Sometimes, the snipers took up to FOUR shots to take down ONE man in the open. I also found my OWN soldiers walking into areas that have just been gassed, or artillery was called in on . They also went into areas that I had gassed or called a mortar/artillery on. They don't seem to use any form of battlefield strategy, let alone common sense!

Last, artillery should take down a tank in one shot. Even it wasn't a direct hit, it couldn't take down infantry in one hit. Shrapnel still exists in explosives!

Overall it was a great game and there were more pros than cons, but I feel as though I am rambling and will stop my "speech". Warfare 1944 exceeds the "greatness" of Warfare 1917 by a long-shot, yet still, bravo. I do believe I have made my point and keep trying harder!

7/10 3/5

Score: 6

"mediocre..."

submission: Besieged

date: December 12, 2009

pretty good game with a good idea, but it is too hard and repetitive. there should be more towers, upgrades that you can buy, and a difficulty setting. (tip for people who think it is too hard: get to lvl.2, place as many as one tower as you can, quit lvl, repeat process for awards.) with a few more additions this could be a potentially good game.

Score: 10

"epicly.....epic"

submission: I love the HALO World

date: December 12, 2009

for all geeks this is something to smile at. you should have probably used a scarab for, "I love arachnids". nice job though. :D

Score: 8

"ok but"

submission: Shields of Gemland

date: November 22, 2009

it was a fun game, but it got boring quick and wasn't too original

Score: 10

"pretty epic"

submission: Pandemic II

date: November 8, 2009

t'was a challenging game, but still fun. i killed most of the world, but failed in my job =(

it was also fun to watch the stranded boats wander around. lol

Score: 5

"wont work"

submission: TheMJ Dress Up Of Madness

date: October 31, 2009

i cant get it to work. i read the pink text too. maybe it hates me, maybe my computer sucks. idk. ill give you 5 for the knowledge you did something

Score: 9

"nice work"

submission: The Gun Game

date: October 30, 2009

good, though on defense the targets come way too slow